A Husband's Drug Use and Its Effect on Divorce, Custody and Maintenance in Jordanian Law

A Husband's Drug Use and Its Effect on Divorce, Custody and Maintenance in Jordanian Law

Rashed Alabwini - Attorney (Regular and Sharia Courts)
By: Rashed Alabwini Attorney (Regular and Sharia Courts)

When one spouse uses drugs, the matter does not remain a personal concern of theirs alone; it turns into a dual legal file that affects the stability of the family and the fate of the children. On one hand, drug use exposes the user to criminal liability under the Jordanian Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. 23 of 2016; on the other, it may open doors for the harmed party under the Jordanian Personal Status Law No. 15 of 2019 relating to judicial separation (tafriq), custody (hadana) and maintenance (nafaqa). Husbands and wives often look into what the law allows in such a situation, but the answer cannot be reduced to "yes" or "no," because each of these two tracks affects the other: the outcome of the criminal file may be reflected in the custody case, and the timing of any step may strengthen or weaken one's position. That is why determining the most suitable path in such cases is a matter settled by a lawyer who combines familiarity with both the criminal and the family sides, after reviewing the details of the file.

1. Two Intertwined Legal Dimensions, Not a Single Track

The first mistake many people make is treating a husband's drug use as a single problem, when it is in fact two inseparable problems. The first is criminal, concerned with the act itself (use or possession) and the prosecution that follows from it. The second is family-related, concerned with the effect of this conduct on the marital relationship and on the children. What makes the file delicate is that the two tracks do not run in isolation from each other: proof of drug use in the criminal file may be used as a presumption in the custody case, just as the husband entering treatment or being acquitted may change the balance of the separation case.

And because the harmed party may rush into a hasty step under the weight of fear for the children, setting the order of priorities (which of the two cases is filed first, what is documented, and when) is the first thing the lawyer assesses, because the first step in these files often charts the course of what comes after.

2. Is a Husband's Drug Use Grounds for Judicial Separation or Divorce?

The Personal Status Law does not view drug use as a magic word that ends the marriage automatically; rather, it looks at the harm this use causes that makes continued marital life between the spouses impossible. When drug use leads to abuse, failure to provide maintenance, danger to the family or the impossibility of continuing married life, the matter falls within the scope of actions for judicial separation for harm or for discord and dispute (shiqaq), paths that allow the harmed wife to request the dissolution of the marital bond under their legal conditions.

However, proving this harm, attributing it to drug use and linking it to the impossibility of continued marital life is the core of the case and not something self-evident. Among the points the lawyer examines: which legal basis best suits the nature of the situation, what evidence of harm is available, and how this intersects with the criminal file, if one exists. Those who want a deeper understanding of one of these paths can refer to the material on the action for separation for discord and dispute.

3. The Effect of Drug Use on Custody

The best interests of the child are the first and final standard in custody cases, and the judge weighs everything that affects the child's physical, psychological and moral safety. This is why one parent's drug use takes on particular importance, because it may be presented as evidence that keeping the child in the user's custody exposes the child to danger, to neglect or to an unsafe environment.

But the matter is not settled by a mere allegation of drug use; the court looks at how serious the incident is, whether it is proven, its actual effect on the child's care, and whether the user has entered treatment that changed their situation. Using the fact of drug use in a custody case, whether to prove it or to rebut it, is therefore delicate legal work that requires convincingly linking the facts to the child's best interests, which the lawyer assesses after reading the file in both its family and criminal aspects.

Aspect The criminal dimension (Narcotics Law of 2016) The family dimension (Personal Status Law of 2019)
Subject of review The act of use or possession and liability for it The effect of the conduct on married life and the children
Authority The Public Prosecution and the criminal courts The Sharia courts
Aim Punishment or alternative treatment Judicial separation, custody or maintenance
Point of intersection Proof of drug use may become a presumption in the family file The outcome of the family case may be affected by where the criminal file ends up

4. Maintenance and the Financial Consequences

The children's right to maintenance does not lapse because of the father's drug use, or even because of his pretrial detention or imprisonment; maintenance is a right of the minor that remains a debt owed by the father, and the custodial mother claims it on the children's behalf through the prescribed legal path. However, the drug-using father's financial difficulties, his stopping work or his going to prison raise, in practice, a problem of collecting the maintenance, not a problem of entitlement to it.

Here the file intersects again: measures may be needed to ensure that maintenance actually reaches the children despite the father's situation. The details of what the children's right covers and how it is preserved fall under the rules on maintenance, and we have devoted a separate article to child support in Jordan that explains when it is owed, how it is assessed and when it lapses.

5. The Criminal Dimension: What the Drug-Using Husband Faces

With respect to the act itself, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Law No. 23 of 2016 draws a fundamental distinction between the user and the trafficker, and gives particular importance to the alternative treatment track for those shown to be users rather than traffickers, which may open a door to treating addiction instead of resorting to punishment alone. This distinction has a far-reaching effect, because characterizing the act as use or as trafficking changes the husband's fate and, with it, the fate of the whole family.

And because the outcome of this criminal track rebounds on the family file (custody, maintenance and stability), managing the defense in the criminal case should not be separated from thinking about its family consequences. To understand how this distinction is built in practice and what follows from it, it is useful to read about drug cases and the role of a drug defense lawyer in Amman.

6. Why This File Needs a Lawyer Who Combines Both Specializations

The greatest danger in these cases is that they are managed on two separate fronts without coordination: one lawyer for the criminal file who does not see its family consequences, and another for the family file who does not take the criminal track into account. In that case, a position may be taken in one of the two cases that unintentionally harms the other, such as submitting something in the family case that complicates the criminal position, or neglecting a fact in the criminal file that could have supported the custody case.

That is why reading the two files together from the start, and ordering the steps between them so that each supports the other, is what protects the harmed party and their children. This dual reading is exactly what a firm working in both Sharia and criminal cases provides.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a wife entitled to request a divorce if her husband uses drugs?

Drug use does not end the marriage automatically, but it may be the basis for an action for separation for harm or for discord and dispute whenever it leads to harm that makes continued marital life impossible. Proving the harm and attributing it to drug use remains the core of the case, which the lawyer assesses according to the facts of the situation and the available evidence.

Does a drug-using father lose custody of his children?

Not automatically; the standard is the best interests of the child. One parent's drug use may be presented as evidence that the child is in danger, but the court weighs whether the incident is proven, its actual effect, and whether the user has entered treatment. Using this fact in a custody case is delicate legal work that requires linking it to the child's best interests.

Does child support lapse if the father is imprisoned for drugs?

No. Maintenance is the children's right and remains a debt owed by the father despite his pretrial detention or imprisonment. The practical problem lies in collecting the maintenance, not in the entitlement to it, and ensuring that it reaches the children may require legal measures that the lawyer handles on behalf of the custodial mother.

What is the difference between how the law treats a user and a trafficker?

The Narcotics Law No. 23 of 2016 draws a fundamental distinction between them, and gives the user particular access to the alternative treatment track, subject to its conditions. Characterizing the act as use or as trafficking changes the husband's fate and, with it, the stability of the family, which is why it is considered one of the most delicate points of the defense.

Does the criminal file affect the custody and maintenance case?

Yes, and this is the heart of the matter. Proof of drug use, or a judgment concerning it, may be reflected in the custody case, just as the father's criminal and financial situation affects the collection of maintenance. That is why it is advisable to manage the two files under a single coordinated approach instead of separating them.

Legal Consultation

Being placed in the position of one spouse facing the other's drug use is one of the most difficult situations, both human and legal: on the side of the harmed wife who fears for her children and wants to protect herself and their future, and on the side of the husband who may face criminal prosecution and the loss of his family at the same time, family and criminal considerations intertwine in a way that leaves no room for hasty decisions. And because a mistake in ordering the steps between the two tracks may weaken the position in both, engaging a lawyer who combines both specializations early makes a real difference in preserving rights and protecting the children. For those seeking a comprehensive reading of their file, the firm offers specialist legal consultation in Sharia cases alongside its experience in criminal cases and drug cases. You can contact Alabwini Law Firm & Legal Consultancy to review the file in both its aspects and discuss the available options.

Related Articles